↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill obese patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill obese patients
Published in
Critical Care, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre-Grégoire Guinot, Elie Zogheib, Sandra Petiot, Jean-Pierre Marienne, Anne-Marie Guerin, Pauline Monet, Rody Zaatar, Hervé Dupont

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT) and the incidence of complications in critically ill, obese patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Other 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 27 27%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,896,698
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,209
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,778
of 168,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#43
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.