You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complexity based measures of postural stability provide novel evidence of functional decline in fragile X premutation carriers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-019-0560-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clodagh O’Keeffe, Laura P. Taboada, Niamh Feerick, Louise Gallagher, Timothy Lynch, Richard B. Reilly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 54% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,094,016
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#161
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,148
of 346,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.