You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How effective are clinical pre-farrowing risk assessment and the use of soft rubber mats in preventing shoulder ulcers in at-risk sows?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Porcine Health Management, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40813-019-0123-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Meyer, Charlotte Vogel, Lothar Kreienbrock, Elisabeth große Beilage |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,079,398
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Porcine Health Management
#62
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,875
of 346,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Porcine Health Management
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.