↓ Skip to main content

Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas J Swartz, Danielle Braxton, Anthony J Viera

Abstract

Nutrition labels are one strategy being used to combat the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 mandates that calorie labels be added to menu boards of chain restaurants with 20 or more locations. This systematic review includes seven studies published since the last review on the topic in 2008. Authors searched for peer-reviewed studies using PUBMED and Google Scholar. Included studies used an experimental or quasi-experimental design comparing a calorie-labeled menu with a no-calorie menu and were conducted in laboratories, college cafeterias, and fast food restaurants. Two of the included studies were judged to be of good quality, and five of were judged to be of fair quality. Observational studies conducted in cities after implementation of calorie labeling were imprecise in their measure of the isolated effects of calorie labels. Experimental studies conducted in laboratory settings were difficult to generalize to real world behavior. Only two of the seven studies reported a statistically significant reduction in calories purchased among consumers using calorie-labeled menus. The current evidence suggests that calorie labeling does not have the intended effect of decreasing calorie purchasing or consumption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 325 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 22%
Student > Bachelor 57 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 14%
Researcher 35 11%
Other 20 6%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 54 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 45 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 13%
Psychology 40 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 9%
Other 69 21%
Unknown 62 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#494,686
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#134
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,516
of 246,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.