↓ Skip to main content

Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,770)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
125 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Gough, James Thomas, Sandy Oliver

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 11 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#381,091
of 19,998,134 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#45
of 1,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,817
of 277,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,998,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them