You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Spatial heterogeneity of environmental risk in randomized prevention trials: consequences and modeling”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0759-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdoulaye Guindo, Issaka Sagara, Boukary Ouedraogo, Kankoe Sallah, Mahamadoun Hamady Assadou, Sara Healy, Patrick Duffy, Ogobara K. Doumbo, Alassane Dicko, Roch Giorgi, Jean Gaudart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,995,207
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#629
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,581
of 346,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#19
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.