↓ Skip to main content

RNA processing errors triggered by cadmium and integrator complex disruption are signals for environmental stress

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNA processing errors triggered by cadmium and integrator complex disruption are signals for environmental stress
Published in
BMC Biology, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12915-019-0675-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Wei Wu, Keon Wimberly, Adele Pietras, William Dodd, M. Blake Atlas, Keith P. Choe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,270,571
of 15,582,553 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#851
of 1,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,813
of 208,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,582,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them