↓ Skip to main content

Bioreactance-based passive leg raising test can predict fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioreactance-based passive leg raising test can predict fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis
Published in
Critical Care, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/cc14257
Authors

C Hu, H Tong, G Cai, J Teboul, J Yan, X Lv, Q Xu, J Chen, Q Rao, M Yan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#9,837,379
of 15,465,366 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,901
of 4,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,511
of 259,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,465,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.