You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current approaches to identify sections within clinical narratives from electronic health records: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0792-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandra Pomares-Quimbaya, Markus Kreuzthaler, Stefan Schulz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 23 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 14% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,576,805
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,531
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,689
of 347,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#35
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.