↓ Skip to main content

A reflection on ethical and methodological challenges of using separate interviews with adolescent-older carer dyads in rural South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A reflection on ethical and methodological challenges of using separate interviews with adolescent-older carer dyads in rural South Africa
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0383-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dumile Gumede, Nothando B. Ngwenya, Stella Namukwaya, Sarah Bernays, Janet Seeley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Other 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 22%
Social Sciences 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,547,758
of 18,704,933 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#790
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,147
of 271,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,704,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them