↓ Skip to main content

Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1698-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary-Anne Ramis, Anne Chang, Aaron Conway, David Lim, Judy Munday, Lisa Nissen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 11%
Lecturer 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 82 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 84 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,893,414
of 24,748,616 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,182
of 3,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,582
of 351,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#38
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,748,616 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.