↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials for low back pain: proof of statistical significance often is not relevant

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials for low back pain: proof of statistical significance often is not relevant
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12955-019-1196-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Davide Corbetta, Lorenzo Moja

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,168,150
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,136
of 2,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,142
of 346,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.