↓ Skip to main content

In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data—possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data—possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the project time
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-019-0926-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatrix Algurén, Annika Nordin, Boel Andersson-Gäre, Anette Peterson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 14 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,415,782
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,387
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,931
of 346,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#28
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.