You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Connected diagnostics: linking digital rapid diagnostic tests and mobile health wallets to diagnose and treat brucellosis in Samburu, Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0854-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Smith, R. Koech, D. Nzorubara, M. Otieno, L. Wong, G. Bhat, E. van den Bogaart, M. Thuranira, D. Onchonga, T. F. Rinke de Wit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 53 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 26% |
| Unknown | 61 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,375,873
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#257
of 2,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,462
of 352,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.