↓ Skip to main content

Pyoderma gangrenosum after caesarean section: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pyoderma gangrenosum after caesarean section: a case report
Published in
Reproductive Health, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-3-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franyke Banga, Nico Schuitemaker, Piet Meijer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Other 3 25%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 75%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,577,567
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,122
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,805
of 67,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.