↓ Skip to main content

Eosinophilic disorders: evaluation of current classification and diagnostic criteria, proposal of a practical diagnostic algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 759)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
55 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eosinophilic disorders: evaluation of current classification and diagnostic criteria, proposal of a practical diagnostic algorithm
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13601-019-0277-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Polliana Mihaela Leru

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,242,748
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#34
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,250
of 359,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.