You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review protocol of timing, efficacy and cost effectiveness of upper limb therapy for motor recovery post-stroke
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1093-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathryn S. Hayward, Sharon F. Kramer, Vincent Thijs, Julie Ratcliffe, Nick S. Ward, Leonid Churilov, Laura Jolliffe, Dale Corbett, Geoffrey Cloud, Tina Kaffenberger, Amy Brodtmann, Julie Bernhardt, Natasha A. Lannin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 36% |
United States | 7 | 28% |
Australia | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
Scientists | 8 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 16% |
Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
Researcher | 11 | 7% |
Lecturer | 5 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 13% |
Unknown | 63 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 16 | 10% |
Engineering | 16 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 10% |
Unknown | 69 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,792,522
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#289
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,689
of 347,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.