↓ Skip to main content

Identifying work ability promoting factors for home care aides and assistant nurses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying work ability promoting factors for home care aides and assistant nurses
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agneta Larsson, Lena Karlqvist, Mats Westerberg, Gunvor Gard

Abstract

In workplace health promotion, all potential resources needs to be taken into consideration, not only factors relating to the absence of injury and the physical health of the workers, but also psychological aspects. A dynamic balance between the resources of the individual employees and the demands of work is an important prerequisite. In the home care services, there is a noticeable trend towards increased psychosocial strain on employees at work. There are a high frequency of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and injuries, and a low prevalence of sustainable work ability. The aim of this research was to identify factors promoting work ability and self-efficacy in care aides and assistant nurses within home care services.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Psychology 9 7%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 36 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#11,941,230
of 21,331,631 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,566
of 3,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,840
of 139,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,331,631 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them