You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0780-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hoang Thi Nam Giang, Ali Mahmoud Ahmed, Reem Yousry Fala, Mohamed Magdy Khattab, Mona Hassan Ahmed Othman, Sara Attia Mahmoud Abdelrahman, Le Phuong Thao, Ahmed Elsaid Abd Elsamie Gabl, Samar Ahmed Elrashedy, Peter N. Lee, Kenji Hirayama, Hosni Salem, Nguyen Tien Huy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,152,015
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#935
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,957
of 346,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.