You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thanks to all those who reviewed for Reproductive Health in 2015
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-016-0148-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José M. Belizán, Sunni Mumford, João Paulo Souza |
| Abstract |
Those devoted to medical science have, as their main purpose, the ambition to improve the quality of life of the population. The editorial team of Reproductive Health is mainly devoted to improving reproductive health, particularly for those populations with major needs.A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. They provide their valuable time without receiving any personal profit to guarantee the quality of research findings. A clear demonstration of generosity, the foundations science was built upon. Final editorial decisions are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors-in-Chief and staff of Reproductive Health warmly thank the reviewers of 2015 whose comments helped to shape the journal, for their invaluable assistance with review of manuscripts in Volume 12 (2015). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,251
of 1,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,377
of 315,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#24
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.