You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aggressive fluid management in the critically ill: Pro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-019-0361-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katsura Hayakawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 60% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Design | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,576,009
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#480
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,112
of 438,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.