You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Homoeolog-specific retention and use in allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica depends on parent of origin and network partners
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter L Chang, Brian P Dilkes, Michelle McMahon, Luca Comai, Sergey V Nuzhdin |
| Abstract |
Allotetraploids carry pairs of diverged homoeologs for most genes. With the genome doubled in size, the number of putative interactions is enormous. This poses challenges on how to coordinate the two disparate genomes, and creates opportunities by enhancing the phenotypic variation. New combinations of alleles co-adapt and respond to new environmental pressures. Three stages of the allopolyploidization process--parental species divergence, hybridization, and genome duplication--have been well analyzed. The last stage of evolutionary adjustments remains mysterious. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Montenegro | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 71% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,394
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,157
of 192,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#25
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.