↓ Skip to main content

How to improve eRehabilitation programs in stroke care? A focus group study to identify requirements of end-users

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to improve eRehabilitation programs in stroke care? A focus group study to identify requirements of end-users
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12911-019-0871-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manon Wentink, L. van Bodegom-Vos, B. Brouns, H. Arwert, S. Houdijk, P. Kewalbansing, L. Boyce, T. Vliet Vlieland, A. de Kloet, J. Meesters

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Engineering 3 5%
Design 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 22 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,146,471
of 15,924,228 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#994
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,963
of 263,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,924,228 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.