You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
C60-Fullerenes: detection of intracellular photoluminescence and lack of cytotoxic effects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-4-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicole Levi, Roy R Hantgan, Mark O Lively, David L Carroll, Gaddamanugu L Prasad |
Abstract |
We have developed a new method of application of C60 to cultured cells that does not require water-solubilization techniques. Normal and malignant cells take-up C60 and the inherent photoluminescence of C60 is detected within multiple cell lines. Treatment of cells with up to 200 microg/ml (200 ppm) of C60 does not alter morphology, cytoskeletal organization, cell cycle dynamics nor does it inhibit cell proliferation. Our work shows that pristine C60 is non-toxic to the cells, and suggests that fullerene-based nanocarriers may be used for biomedical applications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 28% |
Researcher | 14 | 24% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 22% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 12% |
Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
Materials Science | 4 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 24% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#643
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,466
of 155,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.