↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice guideline for renal rehabilitation: systematic reviews and recommendations of exercise therapies in patients with kidney diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Renal Replacement Therapy, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 108)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical practice guideline for renal rehabilitation: systematic reviews and recommendations of exercise therapies in patients with kidney diseases
Published in
Renal Replacement Therapy, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41100-019-0209-8
Authors

Kunihiro Yamagata, Junichi Hoshino, Hitoshi Sugiyama, Norio Hanafusa, Yugo Shibagaki, Yasuhiro Komatsu, Tsuneo Konta, Naohiko Fujii, Eiichiro Kanda, Tadashi Sofue, Kiyonobu Ishizuka, Masashi Kitagawa, Keiji Kono, Norikazu Hinamoto, Takayuki Miyai, Kiyomi Koike, Susumu Toda, Jumpei Hasegawa, Masayuki Yamanouchi, Ryuichi Yoshimura, Ryota Ishii, Shunsuke Goto, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Kentaro Takase, Fumika Taki, Mimiko Matsumura, Yoshihiko Raita, Satoko Sakurai, Tatsuya Shimizu, Suguru Yamanoto, Takehiko Kawaguchi, Hideyo Oguchi, Makoto Tsujita, Masahiko Yazawa, Akiko Uchida, Yasuhiro Ando, Satoru Kaneko, Atsuhiko Matsunaga, Taku Harada, Osamu Ito, Masahiro Kohzuki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 64 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 71 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,123,053
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Renal Replacement Therapy
#6
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,052
of 353,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Renal Replacement Therapy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.