You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to analyse longitudinal data from multiple sources in qualitative health research: the pen portrait analytic technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0810-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Sheard, Claire Marsh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 46% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 28 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 24 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 19% |
| Psychology | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,256,464
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#132
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,271
of 360,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.