You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inspiratory muscle strength training improves weaning outcome in failure to wean patients: a randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A Daniel Martin, Barbara K Smith, Paul D Davenport, Eloise Harman, Ricardo J Gonzalez-Rothi, Maher Baz, A Joseph Layon, Michael J Banner, Lawrence J Caruso, Harsha Deoghare, Tseng-Tien Huang, Andrea Gabrielli |
| Abstract |
Most patients are readily liberated from mechanical ventilation (MV) support, however, 10% - 15% of patients experience failure to wean (FTW). FTW patients account for approximately 40% of all MV days and have significantly worse clinical outcomes. MV induced inspiratory muscle weakness has been implicated as a contributor to FTW and recent work has documented inspiratory muscle weakness in humans supported with MV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 376 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 10% |
| Researcher | 37 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 83 | 21% |
| Unknown | 88 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 155 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 106 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,468
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,368
of 119,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#65
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.