↓ Skip to main content

Monoclonal antibodies in type 2 asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monoclonal antibodies in type 2 asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Respiratory Research, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12931-019-1138-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Edris, Silke De Feyter, Tania Maes, Guy Joos, Lies Lahousse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Other 16 10%
Student > Master 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 64 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 70 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,292,317
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#229
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,728
of 356,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#10
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.