You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nedra S. Whitehead, Laurina O. Williams, Sreelatha Meleth, Sara M. Kennedy, Nneka Ubaka-Blackmoore, Sharon M. Geaghan, James H. Nichols, Patrick Carroll, Michael T. McEvoy, Julie Gayken, Dennis J. Ernst, Christine Litwin, Paul Epner, Jennifer Taylor, Mark L. Graber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 28% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 32 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,444,441
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,242
of 6,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,718
of 357,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#29
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.