You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between phenotype and deletion size in 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-019-1170-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Fernanda Rozas, Felipe Benavides, Luis León, Gabriela M. Repetto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 5 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,968,359
of 23,978,283 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#690
of 2,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,668
of 347,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#18
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.