↓ Skip to main content

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of penicillin G in patients with infective endocarditis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of penicillin G in patients with infective endocarditis
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40780-016-0043-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiaki Komatsu, Takayuki Inomata, Ichiro Watanabe, Masahiro Kobayashi, Hideya Kokubun, Junya Ako, Koichiro Atsuda

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) of penicillin G in patients with infective endocarditis and establish a dosage regimen based on pharmacokinetic data and clinical outcome. Forty-six serum penicillin G samples from 25 individuals were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model. popPK were estimated using a one-compartment model. We created a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for penicillin G efficacy and the ratio of its minimum concentration (Cmin)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Simulations were used to optimize the penicillin G dosage regimen using this ratio. Estimated popPK were: CL (L/h) = 0.21 × creatinine clearance (CLcr) (mL/min), Vd (L) = 28.9. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.87 for clinical efficacy. The cut-off value of penicillin G Cmin/MIC was 60. The continuous administration of 1 million IU penicillin G/h was necessary to achieve a positive outcome for patients with normal renal function (CLcr ≥ 60 mL/min). Our findings suggest that population-based parameters are useful for evaluating penicillin G pharmacokinetics and that an individualized dosage should be determined based on a described dosage regimen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,966,935
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#92
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,390
of 302,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.