↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of a standardized ultrasound examination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a quality improvement among rheumatologists cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility of a standardized ultrasound examination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a quality improvement among rheumatologists cohort
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Ellegaard, Søren Torp-Pedersen, Robin Christensen, Michael Stoltenberg, Annette Hansen, Tove Lorenzen, Dorthe V Jensen, Hanne Lindegaard, Lars Juul, Henrik Røgind, Per Bülow, Stavros Chrysidis, Marcin Kowalski, Bente Danneskiold-Samsoe, Henning Bliddal

Abstract

Quality improvement is important to facilitate valid patient outcomes. Standardized examination procedures may improve the validity of US.The aim of this study was to investigate the learning progress for rheumatologists during training of US examination of the hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Saudi Arabia 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 26%
Researcher 4 13%
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 77%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 2 6%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,441
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,901
of 156,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.