↓ Skip to main content

Size of carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance Chinese atherosclerosis risk evaluation study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Size of carotid artery intraplaque hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance Chinese atherosclerosis risk evaluation study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12968-019-0548-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Liu, Maoxue Wang, Bing Zhang, Wei Wang, Yun Xu, Yongjun Han, Chun Yuan, Xihai Zhao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Engineering 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 17 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,840,966
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#985
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,095
of 364,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.