You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Process evaluation of a National Primary Eye Care Programme in Rwanda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3718-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer L. Y. Yip, Tess Bright, Sebastian Ford, Wanjiku Mathenge, Hannah Faal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,998,334
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,353
of 7,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,743
of 436,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#54
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.