↓ Skip to main content

Molecular pathway profiling of T lymphocyte signal transduction pathways; Th1 and Th2 genomic fingerprints are defined by TCR and CD28-mediated signaling

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Immunology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular pathway profiling of T lymphocyte signal transduction pathways; Th1 and Th2 genomic fingerprints are defined by TCR and CD28-mediated signaling
Published in
BMC Immunology, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2172-13-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruben L Smeets, Wilco WM Fleuren, Xuehui He, Paul M Vink, Frank Wijnands, Monika Gorecka, Henri Klop, Sussane Bauerschmidt, Anja Garritsen, Hans JPM Koenen, Irma Joosten, Annemieke MH Boots, Wynand Alkema

Abstract

T lymphocytes are orchestrators of adaptive immunity. Naïve T cells may differentiate into Th1, Th2, Th17 or iTreg phenotypes, depending on environmental co-stimulatory signals. To identify genes and pathways involved in differentiation of Jurkat T cells towards Th1 and Th2 subtypes we performed comprehensive transcriptome analyses of Jurkat T cells stimulated with various stimuli and pathway inhibitors. Results from these experiments were validated in a human experimental setting using whole blood and purified CD4+ Tcells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 30 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 27 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,911,735
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#116
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,449
of 156,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.