↓ Skip to main content

ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-11-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Stone, Stefano Pozzi-Mucelli, Lang Tran, Karin Aschberger, Stefania Sabella, Ulla Vogel, Craig Poland, Dominique Balharry, Teresa Fernandes, Stefania Gottardo, Steven Hankin, Mark GJ Hartl, Nanna Hartmann, Danial Hristozov, Kerstin Hund-Rinke, Helinor Johnston, Antonio Marcomini, Oliver Panzer, Davide Roncato, Anne T Saber, Håkan Wallin, Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 117 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 16%
Engineering 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Chemistry 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#163
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,441
of 329,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.