↓ Skip to main content

The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
954 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
981 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, John Kimberly, Natasha Cook, Amber Calloway, Frank Castro, Martin Charns

Abstract

The introduction of evidence-based programs and practices into healthcare settings has been the subject of an increasing amount of research in recent years. While a number of studies have examined initial implementation efforts, less research has been conducted to determine what happens beyond that point. There is increasing recognition that the extent to which new programs are sustained is influenced by many different factors and that more needs to be known about just what these factors are and how they interact. To understand the current state of the research literature on sustainability, our team took stock of what is currently known in this area and identified areas in which further research would be particularly helpful. This paper reviews the methods that have been used, the types of outcomes that have been measured and reported, findings from studies that reported long-term implementation outcomes, and factors that have been identified as potential influences on the sustained use of new practices, programs, or interventions. We conclude with recommendations and considerations for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 981 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 954 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 168 17%
Researcher 159 16%
Student > Master 157 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 8%
Other 51 5%
Other 180 18%
Unknown 189 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 198 20%
Social Sciences 154 16%
Psychology 105 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 89 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 54 6%
Other 154 16%
Unknown 227 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,031,870
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#160
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,983
of 161,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.