You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How ARDS should be treated
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-016-1268-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciano Gattinoni, Michael Quintel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 15% |
| United States | 16 | 14% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Italy | 5 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 29 | 25% |
| Scientists | 12 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 16% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 28% |
| Unknown | 28 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 69% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2017.
All research outputs
#606,142
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#391
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,976
of 318,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.