You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, August 2019
Jennifer Erley, Davide Genovese, Natalie Tapaskar, Nazia Alvi, Nina Rashedi, Stephanie A. Besser, Keigo Kawaji, Neha Goyal, Sebastian Kelle, Roberto M. Lang, Victor Mor-Avi, Amit R. Patel
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||56%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||13%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||13%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||9||11%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||8||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||37||47%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2019.
All research outputs
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
of 1,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 347,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.