↓ Skip to main content

Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida isolated from a human in Arizona

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida isolated from a human in Arizona
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-2-223
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn N Birdsell, Tasha Stewart, Amy J Vogler, Elisabeth Lawaczeck, Alisa Diggs, Tammy L Sylvester, Jordan L Buchhagen, Raymond K Auerbach, Paul Keim, David M Wagner

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,303,005
of 8,769,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#553
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,629
of 278,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#29
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,769,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.