↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Mapping the use of research to support strategies tackling maternal and child health inequities: evidence from six countries in Africa and Latin America

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Mapping the use of research to support strategies tackling maternal and child health inequities: evidence from six countries in Africa and Latin America
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12961-016-0099-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily M. Vargas-Riaño, Victor Becerril-Montekio, Miguel Ángel Gonzalez-Block, Patricia Akweongo, Cynthia N. A. Hazel, Maria de Fatima Cuembelo, Felix Limbani, Wanderley Bernardo, Fernando Muñoz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,366,818
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,089
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,803
of 301,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#24
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.