↓ Skip to main content

The gap in injury mortality rates between urban and rural residents of Hubei province, China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The gap in injury mortality rates between urban and rural residents of Hubei province, China
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing Liu, Lan Zhang, Junlin Li, Dan Zuo, Deguang Kong, Xingfu Shen, Yi Guo, Qingjun Zhang

Abstract

Injury is a growing public health concern in China. Injury death rates are often higher in rural areas than in urban areas in general. The objective of this study is to compare the injury mortality rates in urban and rural residents in Hubei Province in central China by age, sex and mechanism of injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Psychology 8 11%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,753
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,018
of 156,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#165
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.