You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Addressing indigenous health workforce inequities: A literature review exploring 'best' practice for recruitment into tertiary health programmes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-11-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elana Curtis, Erena Wikaire, Kanewa Stokes, Papaarangi Reid |
| Abstract |
Addressing the underrepresentation of indigenous health professionals is recognised internationally as being integral to overcoming indigenous health inequities. This literature review aims to identify 'best practice' for recruitment of indigenous secondary school students into tertiary health programmes with particular relevance to recruitment of Māori within a New Zealand context. METHODOLOGY/METHODS: A Kaupapa Māori Research (KMR) methodological approach was utilised to review literature and categorise content via: country; population group; health profession focus; research methods; evidence of effectiveness; and discussion of barriers. Recruitment activities are described within five broad contexts associated with the recruitment pipeline: Early Exposure, Transitioning, Retention/Completion, Professional Workforce Development, and Across the total pipeline. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,228,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#756
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,207
of 169,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.