You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of a CYP1A2 polymorphism on the ergogenic effects of caffeine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-9-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J Womack, Michael J Saunders, Marta K Bechtel, David J Bolton, Michael Martin, Nicholas D Luden, Wade Dunham, Melyssa Hancock |
| Abstract |
Although caffeine supplementation improves performance, the ergogenic effect is variable. The cause(s) of this variability are unknown. A (C/A) single nucleotide polymorphism at intron 1 of the cytochrome P450 (CYP1A2) gene influences caffeine metabolism and clinical outcomes from caffeine ingestion. The purpose of this study was to determine if this polymorphism influences the ergogenic effect of caffeine supplementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 23% |
| United States | 6 | 23% |
| Spain | 4 | 15% |
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 61 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#900,957
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#226
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,115
of 438,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#212
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.