↓ Skip to main content

Accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy compared to conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy compared to conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Radiation Oncology, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-717x-7-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arya Amini, Steven H Lin, Caimiao Wei, Pamela Allen, James D Cox, Ritsuko Komaki

Abstract

While conventionally fractionated radiation therapy alone is an acceptable option for poor prognostic patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, we hypothesized that accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy will have similar efficacy without increasing toxicity.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 4%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,716,513
of 20,294,453 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#76
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,698
of 138,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,294,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them