You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis
Research Involvement and Engagement, August 2019
N. J. Rowbotham, S. J. Smith, Z. C. Elliott, P. A. Leighton, O. C. Rayner, R. Morley, A. R. Smyth
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||37||76%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||8||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||6||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||12||17%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||6||9%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 343,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.