You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hierarchies of evidence applied to lifestyle Medicine (HEALM): introduction of a strength-of-evidence approach based on a methodological systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0811-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. L. Katz, M. C. Karlsen, M. Chung, M. M. Shams-White, L. W. Green, J. Fielding, A. Saito, W. Willett |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Estonia | 1 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 284. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#110,705
of 23,666,107 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,253
of 343,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.