↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of automated assays for detecting hepatitis B and C markers in dried blood spot samples

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usefulness of automated assays for detecting hepatitis B and C markers in dried blood spot samples
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13104-019-4547-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Livia Melo Villar, Helena Medina Cruz, Raissa Martins Deodato, Juliana Custódio Miguel, Elisangela Ferreira da Silva, Geane Lopes Flores, Lia Laura Lewis-Ximenez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Linguistics 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,259,277
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#462
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,181
of 342,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#11
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.