You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to measure the need for transition to adult services among young people with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a comparison of surveillance versus case note review methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0820-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Eke, Astrid Janssens, Johnny Downs, Richard M. Lynn, Cornelius Ani, Tamsin Ford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,591,723
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,381
of 2,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,498
of 347,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#18
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.