↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of erroneous data entries in paper based and electronic data collection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of erroneous data entries in paper based and electronic data collection
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13104-019-4574-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedikt Ley, Komal Raj Rijal, Jutta Marfurt, Naba Raj Adhikari, Megha Raj Banjara, Upendra Thapa Shrestha, Kamala Thriemer, Ric N. Price, Prakash Ghimire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Unspecified 2 5%
Mathematics 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 21 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,838,524
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,501
of 4,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,929
of 342,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#25
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.